🔗 Share this article

Through a unsigned ruling, the highest judicial body cleared the way for Texas to use a newly configured congressional district plan that is projected to include up to five additional conservative-tilting districts. The 6-3 order, handed down on Thursday, grants a appeal by the state to overturn a district court's injunction that had struck down the new map in November.

Justices' Explanation

The district court erroneously placed itself into an active primary campaign, causing much confusion and upsetting the sensitive balance of power in elections, the justices wrote in explaining its action.

The district court had earlier ruled that Texas had probably grouped voters based on their race – a method known as racial gerrymandering – when it passed the new maps. It had mandated the state to employ the maps created after the most recent national count for the next year's election.

Sharp Dissenting Opinion

With a forcefully written objection, Justice Elena Kagan took issue with the court's decision. She stated that it disrespected the work of the district court, pointing out that its decision was actually authored by a judge selected by ex-President Donald Trump.

While our court is superior in jurisdiction, we are not superior in making these fact-intensive determinations, Kagan wrote in a dissent co-signed by Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Ketanji Brown Jackson.

She continued, The majority's order ensures that Texas's redistricting plan, with all its increased partisan advantage, will control next year's elections. And it ensures that many Texas citizens, without justification, will be grouped in electoral districts based on their race. And that result, as this court has declared consistently, is a violation of the constitution.

National Map-Drawing Battle

This decision occurs during a national contest over the redrawing of electoral maps. Texas is an essential part in pushes to alter the U.S. House map to secure a fragile Republican hold. Typically, redistricting happens after a decennial population count. Yet the move by Texas Republicans to initiate a aggressive off-cycle redistricting earlier in the summer triggered a series of events among other states.

Republicans in states like North Carolina and Missouri have also enacted redistricting plans that are estimated to yield a number of additional Republican-leaning seats. Democratic lawmakers, meanwhile, have pushed back with revised boundaries in including California and Virginia, which could offset those potential gains.

Partisan Responses

Lone Star State top lawyer hailed the supreme court ruling. In a release, he said the order defended Texas's fundamental right to draw a map that secures electoral outcomes aligned with his party. Texas is paving the way as we take our country back, district by district, state by state, he stated.

In contrast, opposition party officials criticized the decision. The Court's approval of this extreme, racially gerrymandered Texas GOP map is profoundly disappointing, said the head of a major party election organization.

A top Democratic figure said the court had another time shredded its credibility by approving a race-based map. Tonight's ruling by far-right justices on the supreme court is further proof that the extremists will do anything to rig the midterm elections. The gerrymandered Texas congressional map is a partisan and racially discriminatory power grab designed to subvert the will of the voters – particularly in Black and Latino communities, he added.